Credit: Luckystar Miyandazi |
By stroke of faith I happen to be at this year’s
African Development Week being held in Addis,
Ababa-Ethiopia from 31 March to 5th
April, and good
enough Growth and Development of Africa is the main focus.
Themed,
Towards an
Integrated and Coherent Approach to Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation
of Agenda 2063 and the SDGs, we are just again reminded how much poverty and
underdevelopment has marred our continent that we have to gather experts to
seriously discuss the possible way out.
The 20 items on the Agenda
2063, the 17 sustainable
development goals and the tax justice campaign have the same thing in
common. To eradicate poverty, improve quality of life and foster measurable and
inclusive development.
You might be asking what makes this different from the
Millennium
Development Goals? With half abandoned projects, a continuously increasing
poverty rate and no clear measurement on achievement? Because as at 2015, a
report by Vanguard
Newspaper states that over 100 million Nigerians live below the poverty
line.
To be clear on what we should consider the poverty line, it shouldn’t just be living below 1$ a day, it should be people who have no access to basic needs. Access to food, to shelter, clothing, qualitative education and health care amongst others.You don’t have free access to all of these? This is your fight too.
I’ll give you reasons why these goals should be
different. To successfully deliver on these goals we need financing.
It is obvious Africa needs an intervention, not through foreign aids, not through grants but by looking domestically.
By looking inwards, I mean putting a stop to Illicit
Financial Flows (funds flowing out of Africa through commercial, criminal and
corrupt means) which costs us $50billion annually. What steps are going into
this?
During a press briefing by Dr Anthony Mothae Maruping, the commissioner for
economic affairs at the African Union Commission in Addis, he confirmed that modalities
have been put in place, a consortium of experts who will make sure these
multinational corporations do not evade tax, what does this mean? That if Africa
will finance its own self-development then the $50billion lost yearly to the
IFF’s needs to be stopped and got back.
Is his assurance enough? No. It is not enough that he
has said what we want to hear. We continue to push, we continue to monitor our
government and the policies, agreements and treaty they enter into, we continue
to remind them that we are empowered by knowledge and we know exactly what we
want.
And the first step to pushing would include asking our
government to follow the recommendation at the conference and domesticate the
2063 Agenda which in reality would mean implementing the sustainable
development goals. If they integrate this into national plans, then the issue
of funding can then be discussed.
Taking a look at the 17 Sustainable development goals,
they really could be referred to as a subset of the 2063 agenda. What does this
imply? If the 2063 goals are being domestically implemented into national
plans, and developing an integrated framework. This will avoid duplication of
reporting and a more structured follow
up.
Enough
of “devastating ripples down the economic and financial system, of “declined
commodities exports has meant cut in production, risen unemployment, fallen
incomes and eroded tax bases as well as reduced foreign exchange earnings” as presented
by Dr Anthony.
This
is our opportunity to champion our cause. Let’s get on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment